Abstract... What It's All About... In a Nutshell... Executive Summary... Chemogenesis in 500 Seconds...
Chemogenesis explores the nature of chemical structure and reactivity in logical steps, each described over one or two pages of this web book. This page gives a quick overview of the new approach:
Main Group Element Hydrides
The story starts with the main group elements, as their hydrides.This set includes many common chemicals with well known and understood properties and behaviours: hydrogen, methane, water, hydrogen bromide, argon, etc.
The Five hydrogen Probe Experiments
Five hydrogen probe experiments are performed upon the set of main group elemental hydrides:
- Add a proton: H+
- Remove a proton: H+
- Add a hydride: H–
- Remove a hydride ion: H–
- Remove a hydrogen radical: H•
Due to periodicity, species naturally collect into congeneric (of the same family) arrays.
Observed array dimensions are: [1 x 1] [1 x 4] [1 x 5] & [4 x 4]
The species resulting from the five hydrogen probe experiments present as:
Lewis acids (electron pair acceptors), Lewis bases (electron pair donors), radicals (single, unpaired electrons), metals & complexes
Concentrating on the Lewis acid and Lewis base arrays:
It is well known that Lewis acids interact with Lewis bases to give Lewis acid/base complexes.
So it should come as no surprise that congeneric arrays of Lewis acids interact with congeneric arrays of Lewis bases to give congeneric arrays of Lewis acid/base complexes.
The usual rules of array algebra hold, so that a [5 x 1] array of Lewis acids x a [4 x 1] array of Lewis bases gives a [5 x 4] array of Lewis acid/base complexes:
Congeneric interaction logic can even give rise volumes of chemical species, where the chemistry varies in a regular (linear) way over the three dimensional array:
Several pages chemogenesis web book are spent exploring how linear structural and reactivity traits can be found with respect to atomic ionic radii, bond length, electronegativity, % ionic bond character and pKa.
At this point we introduce some simple frontier molecular orbital (FMO) theory. FMO theory identifies that reactive chemical species interact with each other via a rather limited set of frontier molecular orbitals, the FMOs:
HOMO or Highest Occupied Molecular Orbital
LUMO or Lowest Unoccupied Molecular Orbital
SOMO or Singly Occupied Molecular Orbital
Using data from the hydrogen probe experiments, taking information about the MO structure of diatomic and polyatomic species, considering pericyclic interactions, slicing and dicing data in spreadsheets and The Chemical Thesaurus reaction chemistry database, etc., it is found that there are five general types of reactive species and associated electronic chemical reactivity behaviour:
Lewis acids, Lewis bases and Lewis Acid/Base Complexes
Electron pair acceptor Lewis acids react via their Lowest Unoccupied Molecular Orbital, or LUMO
Electron pair donating Lewis bases react via their Highest Occupied Molecular Orbital, or HOMO
Lewis acid/base complexes have a bonding molecular orbital, MO, resulting from a HOMO/LUMO interaction
Radicals have Singly Occupied Molecular Orbitals, or SOMOs
Radicals couple via SOMO/SOMO interactions to give a bonding molecular orbital, MO
Triplet diradicals have two Singly Occupied Molecular Orbitals or SOMOs
Singlet diradicals have a Highest Occupied Molecular Orbital, HOMO, plus a Lowest Unoccupied Molecular Orbital, or LUMO
Photochemically [and otherwise] activated species
Highly excited SOMO states
Oxidising and Reducing (redox) species
In one type of redox behaviour, pairs of single electrons can transfer from a HOMO to a LUMO to give a LUMO + HOMO
Types of Lewis acid and Lewis base
The arrays of Lewis acid and Lewis base species generated by the five hydrogen probe experiments can be sorted by frontier molecular orbital (FMO) geometry, topology (3D geometrical shape + phase information) and reactivity behaviour.
At this point we slide into the analysis three additional types Lewis acid and Lewis base: electron rich π-system Lewis acids, electron poor π-system Lewis bases and heavy metal Lewis acids.
It transpires that there are, in total, four general types of Lewis base and six general types of Lewis acid:
Four General Types of Lewis Base:
- s-HOMO Lewis bases: hydride ion, H–, and hydrogen, H2
- Complex Anion Lewis bases: tetrafluoroborate ion, [BF4]–
- Lobe-HOMO Lewis bases: hydroxide ion, HO–, water, H2O:, methylcarbanion, H3C–, etc.
- π-System Lewis bases electron rich π-systems: ethene, benzene, etc.
Six General Types of Lewis Acid:
- The Proton Lewis acid: the proton, H+
- s-LUMO Lewis acids: Group 1 and 2 cations: Li+, Mg 2+, etc.
- Onium Ion Lewis acids: ammonium ion, [NH4] +, oxonium ion, [OH3]+, etc.
- Lobe-LUMO Lewis acids: boron trifluoride, BF3, the carbenium ion, H3C+
- π-LUMO Lewis acids: electron poor π-systems, enones, tetracyanoethylene, etc.
- Heavy Metal Lewis acids: cations and bulk metals of the transition metals, post-transition metals, lanthanides and actinides
Each of the four types of Lewis base and six types of Lewis acid exhibits distinct electronic structure and characteristic reaction chemistry behaviour.
The Lewis Acid/Base Interaction Matrix
The four types of Lewis base interact with the six types of Lewis acid to produce a matrix of Lewis acid/base complexes. Crucially, each and every cell of the Lewis acid/base interaction matrix encapsulates and exhibits distinct electronic structure and characteristic reaction chemistry behaviour:
For example, an s-LUMO Lewis acid such as the sodium ion, Na+, interacts with a Lobe-HOMO Lewis base such as the hydroxide ion, HO–, to give sodium hydroxide, a Type 7 complex. The point is that most of the basic, proton abstracting reagents and many of the neutral inorganic salts found in the chemistry laboratory are Type 7 Lewis acid/base complexes, including:
- methyl lithium, H3CLi
- potassium hydroxide, KOH
- sodium carbonate, Na2CO3
- sodium hydrogen carbonate, NaHCO3
- sodamide, NaNH2
- lithium fluoride, LiF
- calcium hydroxide, Ca(OH)2
- sodium sulfide, Na2S
- sodium cyanide, NaCN
- magnesium oxide, MgO
- barium sulfate, BaSO4
Like the periodic table, the Lewis acid/base interaction matrix is a schema and an extraordinary object with many properties. Indeed, the vast majority of the reaction chemistry taught to school and university students can be mapped to the Lewis acid/base interaction matrix with the effect that the chemistry has context, rather than existing as isolated facts:
Watch the YouTube video:
Prof. Roald Hoffmann, who won the Nobel prize for his work FMO theory, wrote in a personal communication:
"A great combination of frontier orbital (of course I like that) and chemical ways. I like it."
The Mechanism Matrix
The chemogenesis story continues with an analysis of reaction mechanisms. First, the various types of simple atom-to-atom mapping are considered:
These are arranged against the five types of electronic mechanism introduced above, Lewis acid/base, radical, redox, diradical & photo:
The mechanism matrix helps put the various types of mechanism into context as it formally separates the electronic aspects of mechanism from the atom-to-atom mappings.
Consider "nucleophilic substitution".
Our analysis separates the notion of nucleophilic from the notion of substitution.
However, due to the complexity of reaction chemistry the full mechanism matrix is actually not that useful as it is better to map the species and reaction information to a relational system (RDMS) such as The Chemical Thesaurus reaction chemistry database.
Chemogenesis: The Map of Ideas
There are various routes through the chemogenesis analysis, as the map below shows:The arrows show the logical steps through the Chemogenesis argument. For example, the Five Reaction Chemistries are arrived at in at least three ways: by analysing the results of the hydrogen probe experiments, by analysis of linear π-system structure and by a study of species/species interactions:
The Chemical Thesaurus Reaction Chemistry Database
The sister to this Chemogenesis Web Book is the The Chemical Thesaurus Reaction Chemistry Database:
To Sum Up
BOLD CLAIM: Without chemogenesis, it is necessary to learn about chemical reactions and chemical reactivity by the accumulation and assimilation of facts.
With chemogenesis, sense is made of a morass of chemical reaction information and the structure of reaction chemistry space logically emerges from physics, complexity and all.